Advocates of the new listing claim that to remove the bears from their threatened status, the federal government must first enact restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions, which will then, it is imagined, influence the global climate to such an extent as to stop shifts in Arctic ice cover. Listing the bear will enable activist groups to use litigation to force the nation into a regulatory nightmare of limits on energy use.
“We regret the listing,” said Competitive Enterprise Institute Director of Energy & Global Warming Policy Myron Ebell. “We don’t think putting ‘high bars’ on it will work. We hope there will be immediate litigation to challenge the listing on procedural and substantive grounds.”
Today’s listing does require a “high bar” for evidence that particular greenhouse gas sources are causing actual harm to a particular population of polar bears. But “the ‘high bar’ just delays the day when global warming activists will be able to impose their policy of energy suppression,” said CEI Senior Fellow

0 comments:
Post a Comment